You Are Viewing

A Blog Post

The War Criminal Churchill

This article was found on the Calvin College website, they are a Christian academic community dedicated to rigorous intellectual inquiry. Calvin College was founded in 1876 by the Christian Reformed Church in North America and named for 16th-century reformer John Calvin.

[google-translator]

Background: This 1944 essay by Alfred Rosenberg analyzes a collection of Churchill’s pre-war essays. Rosenberg concludes that Churchill was long plotting war against Germany, supported from behind the scenes by the Jews. I am using Churchill’s original words from Step by Step: 1936-1939 (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939). With an occasional exception, the German translation is accurate, though the passages are, as one might expect, chosen selectively.

The source: Alfred Rosenberg, “Der Kriegsverbrecher Churchill,” Der Schulungsbrief, (March/April 1944), p. 20-22, 28.

The War Criminal Churchill

by Alfred Rosenberg

For many years, the main propagandist against the German people has been Winston Churchill, driven on by influential money from American and Jewish sources. It is therefore instructive to examine the career of this war criminal, using his own words.

Even before he became prime minister, Churchill consistently agitated against Germany in his articles, angrily attacking above all anyone in England who strove for an understanding with Germany. Later, Churchill affirmed this journalistic agitation when he published his essays, only lightly retouched he said, in a book. He titled it Step by Step. It contained his essays written between 1936 and 1939. Step by Step was intended to suggest that the German Reich had intentionally caused the new world war, and that it was really Churchill who warned the so-called civilized nations about it. In fact, Churchill’s hatred of Europe’s Renaissance, and its peaceful order, flows from every line. Let me examine several unintentional admissions more carefully.

One of the central points of Churchill’s thinking has to do with England’s billions of investments in the Far East. Everything centers around the opium trade and similar profitable businesses. Churchill clearly had interested big money in his closest circle, with whose favor and help he wanted to become prime minister of the kingdom of Great Britain. On 3 September 1937, he published an article titled “The Wounded Dragon,” by which he meant China. He wrote:

No single power, except after long preparation, could impose its will upon Japan in the Yellow Sea. If the United States and Great Britain acted together jointly for several years, and if they were supported by Soviet Russia, representations could no doubt be made to which Japan would have to defer. [Rosenberg cuts an intervening section without noting it.]

We have created great establishments and businesses in China which have done nothing but good [Rosenberg inserts a “?” here] to the Chinese….. European and American missionaries have carried their message fearlessly into the recesses of China.

These words clearly show Churchill’s longing for a grand alliance between England, the USA, and the Soviet Union two years before the war broke out. The Chinese, ruined by England, are mocked when he says that the English provision of opium and missionaries had brought “only good.” Everyone knew that China was the target of Jewish and other high finance, and Churchill’s sanctimonious tone hardly concealed the true reasons for his policies in the Far East. Churchill clearly directed his attentions in 1937 to protecting big business in China, adding in the same sentence: “If Europe wishes to talk to the East, she will have to clean up her home lines first.”

This single sentence reveals Mr. Churchill’s entire war policy. He wants to “clean up” Europe, which means making any kind of common effort impossible that would benefit the entire continent and bring about a new order. He wants to perpetuate the impotence and fragmentation of the civilized European states. After Europe has been “cleaned up,” and after India and the Middle East have been exploited, he wants to bring all of the Far East under the thieving capitalism of the City and Wall Street, as well as subjecting it to the Bolshevist threat.

After this beginning, Churchill reveals how he wants to prepare for the “cleaning up.” It involves the isolation and defeat of the German Reich. When the Führer and the Duce met in fall 1937, Churchill wrote the following on 1 October 1937:

The Western democracies, now armed and arming heavily, have much to give these harassed dictators, if they would only prove that they mean to be the friends and not the bane of our common humanity. If the true concert of Europe were re-established, our collective remonstrances would not go unheeded in the Far East.

Churchill thinks only of re-establishing the European concert, which means a situation in which England is the outside choir master. His comment that the Western democracies are armed, and arming heavily, shows that all the latter chatter about being “unprepared” was simply a lie. When Italy, under Mussolini, later took successful steps to secure Africa, Churchill angrily wrote on 4 March 1939:

But this is not the end. The underlying realities and verities of Europe will increasingly assert themselves. In a short time we shall know whether Mr. Chamberlain’s hope of detaching Mussolini from Hitler will be realized. If it is not realized, nothing else that Mussolini could give us is of the slightest value. [Rosenberg omits a section here without noting it.] If Mussolini is willing to separate from Hitler, to take his stand with France and Britain, and help sustain the independence of Austria, there will be an undoubted gain.

These words reveal not only Churchill’s policies, but also those of that fine man Prime Minister Chamberlain. We learn from Churchill’s own mouth that the good Mr. Chamberlain used all his strength to separate Mussolini from Adolf Hitler, which leads to the necessary conclusion that the goal was to encircle both of them, “cleaning up” one after the other.

The reference to Austria as the hoped-for launching pad next to Czechoslovakia is more than clear. That is why Churchill fell into such a rage as Ostmark German-Austria jubilantly joined the German Reich. In an article titled “The Austrian Catastrophe” [the actual title was “The Austrian Eye-Opener”] dated 18 March 1938, Churchill wrote of the “seizure and subjugation of Austria,” although this man naturally knew very well that only a small clique of Jews and reactionaries were listening to England and the Jews, whereas the whole decent population of Ostmark [Austria] could hardly contain its joy as the dream of the union of all Germans was fulfilled — as indeed was consistent with the right of self-determination that even the Entente had once proclaimed.

In the same article, he began provocative warmongering to bring about a war coalition against Germany.

The first step is to find out which of the Powers of the second rank in Europe would be willing to join with Great Britain and France for special action, not excluding armed resistance, under the Covenant of the League.

It is not without its attractions to establish that world power England immediately tried to discover which of the “smaller” European powers were ready to serve as canon fodder against the German Reich. The remark become even more interesting when he further says: “It must also be made clear that there is no desire to encircle Germany, but only to encircle an aggressor.”

Encirclement! It is well known that British policy always claimed to have no intention of encircling Germany. But now Winston Churchill himself has used the word “encirclement,” and that cannot be erased from the world. He himself affirmed with this word a plan to encircle Germany, which he insolently terms an aggressor. No subsequent attempts at concealment can rescue Churchill the warmonger, who has revealed himself.

Throughout the period, Churchill relied on France as a junior partner, and naturally feared that its various party groups could cause a weakening of its military power. In 1938 he wrote on the newly-formed Daladier government:

If France broke, everything would break, and the Nazi domination of Europe, and potentially of a large part of the world, would seem to be inevitable.

This is another bald-faced lie, suggesting that Germany wanted not only to unite all Germans, but bring the whole world under its “tyranny.” He turns next to nasty agitation against all those decent Englishmen who really want peace. Churchill writes:

I wonder whether the French people realize how bitter and persistent is the pro-German propaganda in this island? The strongest point, repeatedly made, is that France is on the verge of collapse. She is portrayed as about to go down the same bloody sewer as Spain has done. All the “Heil Hitler” brigade in London society exploit and gloat over what they are pleased to call “the Parliamentary impotence of the French democracy.”

Churchill’s Jewish brigade guided his attempt to make the so-called “Heil Hitler brigade” in London look ludicrous, even though it consisted of far-sighted Englishmen. They financed him, and were also the main agitators behind Roosevelt in the United States. The US-American ambassadors in France and Poland continually and intentionally fanned the world conflagration. After wishing Daladier “all the best,” Churchill mentions Jewish forces in France, writing:

But he has one important political force in reserve. M. Blum will not fail the cause of European freedom. His influence with the Socialist party is commanding. He will certainly give loyal aid.

The Jew Blum, of course, was the hope of all Jewish lackeys, and one of the main agitators against an understanding between the German Reich and the French Republic.

Following the essays in chronological order, I come to May 1938. Churchill returns to the presumed difficulties of the Japanese in China, noting in his article of 26 May 1938 that these difficulties are primarily the result of Russian threats:

Here we must recognize the services which Soviet Russia is rendering in the Far East to civilization and also to British and United States interests.

On 6 July 1938, Churchill moans once more about the so-called rape of Austria, but he is worried most about the Jews. He complains about the incarceration of the representative of Jewish high finance, Rothschild, about the terrible fact that “Jewish ladies” are forced to clean the streets, then continues:

But 300,000 Jews in Vienna present a problem of large dimensions and intractable quality to a policy of extirpation.”

After Churchill has lamented the presumed terrible economic situation of the Jews, he turns, as always, to making threats:

The tale of their tribulation spreads widely through the world, and it is astonishing that the German rulers are not more concerned at the tides of abhorrence and anger which are rising ceaselessly against them through the heavily-arming United States.

Churchill sees Jewish rage over the fact that it is not possible to bleed the German Reich dry, since Germany has freed its lands from parasites, as a decisive factor in politics, and therefore unintentionally reveals the extent to which Englanders and Americans have become unable to govern their nations themselves, making their fate and their activities — the “heavily-arming United States” — dependent on the rage and opinions of big Jewish financial parasites and Bolshevist agitators.

This careless statement by Mr. Churchill shows in which direction, and on whose orders, Great Britain’s current prime minister is directing his policies. It is occasionally healthy and good to look at what a war criminal once wrote, and later gathered together in a book. They reveal that his war crimes were systematically planned.

This places all those lying communiqués from whatever world conference he and his buddies have gathered at in their proper light. They show how Churchill strove “step by step” for power, motivated by hatred and pride, supported by Jewish agitation. The plainly stated goal was to turn the Far East into an enormous object of exploitation for the whole of Jewish world plutocracy, “cleaning up” Europe in the process so as to render it powerless, to atomize it into its various parts, splitting it into battling states so that it would keep from involvement in world politics, and ultimately impoverish itself. To this end, he worked together with Mr. Chamberlain to isolate Fascist Italy from Germany, to arrange an alliance of the smaller peoples against the German Reich (meaning, probably Czechoslovakia and Poland, later Belgium and Holland), and to use the “independence” of Austria as a launching pad for an attack of the entire anti-European world conspiracy to subject the German people to Jewish exploitive policies.

Mr. Churchill stands before us today as a war criminal, as a world-class criminal, revealed through his own words. It would be good for so-called neutrals to pay serious attention to his words, and to know the situation in which the German Reich found itself. Then they will understand that this German Reich today is the only force battling the conspiracy of Pan-Jewish Anglo-American biological plans for destruction, and is using its full strength to defend and protect the old Europe, even the lives of those who do not believe that they have to take the war seriously, since they still live in a safe place.

Source: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/schul05.htm

44
SHARES
20 Comments
  • Mary Barnes on May 17, 2016

    You keep referring to England. England is just apart of the UK, which is made up of Scotland, Ales, and Northern Ireland. The UK won WW2, not just England.

  • John McLeod on April 11, 2016

    Erik,
    I find your comment regarding the “good people” who do not see the deception support and service those who are purely evil as accurate. I know that bad information leads to bad decisions. This is the intent of propaganda. I personally have a life long pursuit of finding the truth, however, truth is very hard to prove. The article above is an excellent example. The history of WWII that I have grown up with in the United States has been portrayed on television to the masses without any real proof. Television in the US is the most lethal form of propaganda that the deaf dumb and blind follow making them the most ignorant “good” people supporting pure evil in the world. It lead to 17 years in Viet Nam and now forever it seems in Iraq and Afghanistan. People told they are defending democracy and freedom that are killing themselves when they cannot live with the atrocities that they have committed. Too late they have realized they were supporting evil and piers.

    My father who served in the Navy in WWII knew that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was not a sneak attack. How did he know? He never told me how he knew this so I must guess that it was his intuition. There is enough proof now that Roosevelt let it happen to work the nation up to accept going to war. No one has ever wondered why there were no aircraft carriers in the harbor when the ships to protect them were there…all lined up while the guard was dropped. Although war was imminent, is it plausible that everyone would be asleep at the wheel? These oddities are pieces of a puzzle of lies.

    What is my point here Erik? It is that it is easier to look for lies than finding the truth. Exposing a lie leads you closer to the truth. Now ultimately, with the article above and other more accurate histories of WWII (look up David Irving and Jim Marrs for a more accurate history that contradicts anything in the US!) we find that it was a war of bankers who happened and still are Jewish.

    I am not antisemitic Erik, I am however anti religions. Do not misunderstand that statement as i am definitely not an atheist. If we all derived from the same point of creation, there is no reason to have anything but the exact same religious beliefs. Therefore my conclusion is that they cannot all be right. Is one more right than another? Cannot prove this either way, therefore my suggestion to those “following” theirs is to give it up and join the whole worlds races in a loving embrace. We are all “good people” being led by evil, so the solution is simple….stop folioing, stop hating, stop judging, and start accepting.

    We are accountable for the decisions we make Erik. If we blindly follow serving evil, we are still accountable even though we had good intentions. That is the problem in that we are not asking if what we are doing is righteous. Some of the masses know it is wrong but follow anyway as it is easier to follow than to challenge. Unless we stop following, I am afraid this planet, all of humanity and the species are doomed as we are seem to be fatal…following and serving evil.

  • Miriam on December 4, 2015

    What about mixed people? We can’t all be blonde/blue eyed and Europe never was – look at France, Spain, Italy. Lots of brown haired/brown eyed people who were not Jewish or not for centuries at least. What about Roma who have been in Europe for centuries too? We’re as much scared of and the targets of the supremacists (Jewish and Nordic) as the average white person. It’s not about race, it’s always about money.

  • Ashley on October 29, 2015

    All of you are crazy. You spout archaic ideals without any understanding of what it means. Who are you to decide what a “happy” world is to someone else? You forget that the “white” culture is responsible for the hostile takeover of dozens of cultures and races. By your own definition of genocide Caucasian races should have been put to death a long time ago. I am a white and proud to be so, but not the point of ignorance. And certainly not to the point where I cry out against other races, sexuality and religions for silly and unfounded offenses. Get over yourselves.

  • James Bond on May 25, 2015

    Bull……

  • James on February 28, 2015

    Erik I couldnt agree more man.

    In my opinion gays are people who are mentally unstable individuals who were abused or born with less sense of confidence then others.

    How many times have you heard a gay person say they went gay later in life (even after sexual contact with the opposite sex.) Also how many have become gay over trafic life events? Like being raped or beaten by the opposite sex, these people arent gay they are CLINICALLY DEPRESSED. Depression causes multiple negatives and is like a cancer.. sometime when u realize you have it it may be too late and ur life is changed because of it.

    And your right again about gender diagressions as well. People need to accept the truth, we all have our strengths and weaknesses. Women are PHYSICALLY BORN with less muscle fibers then men its been proven scientifically. Just like african americans were born with more fibers in their leg miscle then most caucasions.

    The faster we accept the truth the better our civilization will be! We nees to FIGHT against those who dissemate equality in something other then human rights. Im sorry but were only equal im the sense that were both humam beings.

    • E L on September 9, 2015

      You obviously haven’t got a clue about gay people. I have known many gay people over the years and I have never heard any of them say they have turned gay later in life – they all, without exception, said they were always knew they were gay. You can even see it in the physiology of many gay men who, even from a young age, have obviously very feminine characteristics and girls who have obviously very masculine characteristics. You think they just acquire that or fake it to make a point? lol
      Accept the fact that being gay is just a anomaly of nature, that is: a genetic anomaly, and we can end a lot of unnecessary suffering in the world. People like you, in your total ignorance, would have gay people ostracized and being made to feel like there is something wrong with them that a little bit of psychotherapy could clear up. It is not that simple. If it was, don’t you think more gay people would have done that by now? Do you even have any idea how many gay people over the decades have tried to get psychiatric treatment to “make” them go heterosexual and none of it ever worked. Those who say they went gay later in life are obviously bisexual. A true gay or lesbian would never say that.

  • Oscar Brown on December 4, 2014

    WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for The War Criminal
    Churchill

    • Eberhardt on January 31, 2015

      And today’s Propaganda…

  • Chris Williams on May 26, 2014

    Churchill was first and foremost a man of his class – the extremely narrow elitist class of the English aristocracy which has always had an Olympian contempt for ordinary working class and middle class Britons. The line of the Spencer family to which he belonged has in fact always chaffed that they are not the royal family of Britain.

    This class has always seen greater affinity between its members and the members of of royal households and aristocracies in other countries before any affinity with their own nationals.

    But Churchill was even a traitor to his own class! Because he was someone who wanted to see the destruction of other aristocratic elites to ensure the pre-eminent world position of Britain’s aristocracy and its empire.

    He achieved this in WW1 with the destruction of the central European empires and their royal dynasties. This meant only the French provided any real imperial competition to Britain and Churchill never thought they could not be intimidated. Having achieved his goals in WW1, one of his chief preoccupations at this time was to see if the US could be re-integrated into the British empire!

    But then, of course, Hitler came along and again threatened the hegemony of the British ruling class, and the power of their Jewish financiers. Once again he roped in the US. He thought he could use the US in a similar way that he had in WW1 but of course this time the US were far more powerful. In Roosevelt, Churchill didn’t realize what a mongrel dog he had on his leash, one which was ready to chew England up and spit it out once he had been unleashed – which is precisely what he did, leaving Britain with massive war debts which destroyed it as a world power and ended its once glorious empire.

    The only amusing part in all of this is that there can be no doubt that in time Churchill will be seen not only as a war monger but as the most hopeless Briton in history. In time he will be exposed not only as the man who unleashed such terrible murder on civilian populations, he will also be seen as the man who destroyed the British empire – all for the sake of trying to save its stupid moneyed elite.

    • Jimi on June 7, 2014

      Churchill is also the reason that Europe’s (and Britain’s) native white population is being wiped away, ethnically cleansed and driven towards extinction through non-European immigration invasion of many millions of non whites and Muslims.

      Churchill, Damn you for being such an idiot.

      Not only did you loose the British Empire but you are also loosing the existence of the British people itself.

      • Ibrahim on July 8, 2014

        I am not convinced about immigration making whites extinct. From what one can see in the UK, majority of whites pair up with whites, similarly Asian and Blacks. Only a small minority are mixed.
        Also whites themselves have decided to postpone or forget marriage and have fewer children. Those that have many children are quite often unmarried mothers who have had several partners – not really helping the white cause, is it?
        Immigration and Muslims are not responsible for the above nor for Women’s lib and all that malarkey which is one of the biggest factors of white man’s decline in birthrates.

        • konwayk on July 8, 2014

          Jews want to destroy European culture. In order to do that, they need multiculturalism.

          When European culture becomes extinct, White Europeans will also become extinct.

          Let me give an example to visualize.

          How can there be christians without bible? How can there be muslims without quran?

          Bible is absolutely important for the existence of Christians. Quran is absolutely important for the existence of Muslims.

          Just like that, European culture is absolutely important for the existence of White Europeans.

          Another purpose of Multiculturalism also has to do with developing Communism. This will not only destroy Europe, but the entire world.

          Here is a famous quote from Jewish playwright.

          “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them into the program of the Communist Party. In America, we aim for several victories. While inflaming the Negro minorities against the whites, we will instill in the whites a guilt complex for their supposed exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Blacks to rise to prominence in every walk of life and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and will begin the process which will deliver America to our cause.” (Jewish Playwright Israel Cohen, A Radical Program For The Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in Congressional Record , Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernathy).

          Of Course, Jews hide the fact that they were behind African slavery, Indian slavery, Irish slavery, and many other slavery.

        • Erik on September 3, 2014

          You’re talking nonesense. Whites have to support non-white birh rates and thus can’t have enough children to maintain their own population.

          Obviously 1st and 2nd genertation immigrants (or Invidaers*) don’t intermarry but after 3rd generation their decentands are “assimilated” into these white nations and this is when the genocide takes place. it is genocide in the LONG RUN. Unfortunatly, In the long run these two populations and racial groups WILL MIX and this is where the charge of genocide is realistic.

          The 1948 UN defention of genocide clearly states that genocide or destruction of racial group does not have to be immidiate but can be long term.

          Putting in place CONDITIONS that lead and can lead to genocide are sufficient to hang someone for attemted genocide.

          The condtions that lead to intermarriage are FORCED. There was no voting regarding alien immigration. No one had asked us here in Sweden whether we want to be breed out of existance and be replaced in our own homeland by Arabs, Somalis and other non whites. It was forced against us.

          Why is it genocide – short explanation:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQf3rV2qA9A

          Genocide is defined by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on December 9, 1948.

          Article 1- The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

          Article 2- In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
          • (a) Killing members of the group;
          • (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
          • (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

          • (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
          Article 3 – The following acts shall be punishable:
          • (a) Genocide;
          • (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
          • (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
          • (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
          • (e) Complicity in genocide.

          Genocide does not have to be violent in nature. The UN definition of (C) “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”.

          (e) “Forcibly (it is forced – there was no voting regarding immigration) transferring children of the (racial) group to another (racial) group” – is a perfect description to what is going on today in white nations.

          (d) “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group” – White people in Europe can’t afford to have children as a result of the alien immigration invasion since they are forced to fund the aliens and their birth-rate and are worried in bringing children to the world in an increasingly conflicted and violent “MultiCultural” society.

          You don’t even need the UN to rely on. Just use your common sense, Genocide is simply the destruction of a race of people.

          If I was to flood the natural habitat of panda bears with brown bears and thus create the condtions for the breeding out of existance of the panda bears you can imagine the outcry from these “Liberal” (who are really sick psychopaths) about how evil it is. Yes they care more about “pandas” than our own beautiful Germanic/Nordic heritage. They don’t care about the survival of a our beatiful kind of humanity – our blue eyed and blond Germamic humanity – but they get out of their way to ensure that every race of bear, elephant or cat is perserved. If this isn’t a sign of psychosis, I don’t know what is.

          These psychopaths get out of their way to “SAVE TIBET” and the cultural and racial heritage of the Tibetan people when the people of tibet screams for the UN to help save them from extinction . Yet, They call Europeans who want to perserve themselves and ensure their survival “NazisWhoWantToKillSixMillionJews”.

          There’s no race of humans on this planet who want to be blended out of existance and become exitnct. Please ask the Japanse people if they want to breed themselves out of existance with Black Africans, and they would tell you that you are psychopath and indeed you are if you belive it should be done.

          GENOCIDE is GENOCIDE is GENOCIDE it it should be punishable by DEATH without any mercy or compassion for the psychopaths who PROMOTE and SUPPORT it. I see it first hand here in Sweden, and if you think I’ll show mercy to those who don’t want Swedish babies (and Germanic babies in general) to be born anymore, than you are mistaken.

          When the issue is SURVIVAL, The higest morality is to fight for the survival of your people and your race. There is no higer morality than this.

          I regard white race traitros who mix with aliens as the greatest evil imaginable for they take part in the genocide of their own race. This is treason!

          These people are crazy, but what more can be expected from mentally insane people ?!

          Self hatred is indeed a sickness.

          • liz on October 14, 2014

            Hello Erik.

            I agree with your desire to save your race. You are a good man – a man with honor – something most people seem to lack in these difficult times.

            I would like to ask you how do define goodness?

            How do you decide what is Good versus what is Evil?

            I’d like to hear your view. 🙂

          • Erik on October 15, 2014

            Hi liz

            How does one tell Right from Wrong, Good from Evil?

            How do I tell Good from Evil?

            Very Simple. The effect of an action can objectively tell you whether the action was Good i.e. working in the service of Good or whether an action was Evil i.e. working in the service of Evil.

            Evil always tries to present itself as Good in order to fool people to except it.

            There are people who are knowingly evil and doing evil but most who are involved in evil are actually really good people who were fooled and manipulated and brainwashed by the system that they actually work for the greater good when in fact they work in the service of pure evil, yet they are not aware of it. Once awaken such people quickly change their behavior and join the good guys. These people are redeemable.

            There are people who control society who work at the top of the system. These people are conscious of their evil and the wickedness and criminality of their actions and they are enjoying doing evil and destroying society. Everything they do is agreed upon and calculated.

            Most of the actions that are carried out today the name of “Goodness”, “Human-Rights”, “Tolerance” etc. are actually working in the service of PURE EVIL – and this can be easily shown by the implications and the results of those actions.

            I’ll give you an example. Let’s say that there’s a little kid who wants to play with dangerous drugs. Should his parents show “Tolerance” for his/her actions?! Should they just let him play with fire out of “Tolerance” and “Freedom” and “Human Rights” – after all he/she has the “Freedom” and “Human Right” to do what ever he/she wants?!

            Should the parents be “Nice” and “Excepting” and “Tolerating” these actions that are harmful and dangerous to their kid?! Should the parents just scream “Freedom” and allow their kid to do what he wants until is completely damaged for life by dangerous drugs?

            Or should the parents be angry and scream at their kid to stop and even punish him/her by telling him “you are grounded and “can’t play your video games for a 4 weeks”,

            Which parent actions are really driven by True Love to their kid?

            In today’s twisted morality evil, injustice and destructiveness to society are tolerated in the name of “Tolerance”, “Human Rights”, “Anti-Racism”, “Gay Rights” and “Minority Rights”.

            Every form of sickness, vice and evil is being promoted under these fake labels.

            For example in the name of “Anti-Racism” they promote the greatest act of evil one can carry out against a race of humans – The ethnic cleansing and genocide of an entire race- The complete eradication of the peoples of Europe from the planet. There is no higher form of racism than that of destroying a race and displacing it its natural habitat.

            Imagine if this ethnic cleansing and genocide we know as “multiculturalism” was to be carried out against the Asian race, The black race of the Arab race. Imagine the outcry by “Human Rights” groups and the UN. The peoples of Europe don’t seem to have “Human Rights” to survive and exist. Every non-white people does have such rights. We don’t.

            In the name of “Women Rights” they take away the most basic right – the right to live. The right of little babies to live – millions of whom were “aborted” while still alive with a full functioning nervous system. Many had resisted their own slaughter while in the womb ,where they were murdered by doctors whose really goal is to SAVE the lives of the innocent – NOT TO TAKE THEM AWAY.

            In the name of “Men & Women Equality” i.e. Feminism , they divide men and women and make them into enemies rather than natural companions – they destory the femily and a warm place for children to grow normally

            . Men and Women are basically different parts of each other biologically, physiologically, anatomically and mentally. They are EACH OTHER – the COMPLETE HUMAN BEING.

            Turning men and women – males and females – into enemies is turning ourselves against ourselves. It’s like turning plugs against the sockets and vice versa, the plug has no functional meaning without a socket and the socket has no functional meaning without a plug, Plug (male) in not independent of the socket (female) and vice versa, They are DEPENDED on each other to function – they have no meaning without each other. A male’s sperm has only one function and it is to be injected in a female. A male’s sperm has no meaning without a female to inject it to- that is its biological aim. Turning males and females into enemies It’s like shooting your self in your own leg. It would hurt. Just try it. I promise you it will. We cannot survive without each other.

            You cannot have electricity without a plug and a socket – the puzzle that bring life/light into this world.

            In the name of “Homosexual Rights” the establishment and media promotes as an “option” one of the most serious sexual disorders and medical problems on this planet.

            They promote this sickness in the media, in the papers despite the disgust of most people, they try to promote this abnormal and disordered sexual tendencies to children and basically telling them that it is “normal” to “experiment” with sexual relations with members of the same sex. They tell them that it is “normal” for a man to “marry” another man, They tell them that it is “normal” for men to have sex with men. Never mind that such freakish behavior is no more “normal” than having sexual acts with an animal.

            Every form of sickness, abnormality and deviance they promote in the name of “Tolerance”. Instead of being honest and telling children that this is a disorder and a medical problem for which the inflected should not be blamed or hated, they actually turn reality and the principles of biology and physiology and nature and sell this disorder as an “option”.

            They allow homos to adopt children and therefore denying them a healthy and normal development, In order to “save” the “feelings” gays we are asked to to the greatest evil and injustice towards those children who don’t deserve to be raised by non-healthy people. When this can be avoided why put them there.

            They push this disease in the media and basically don’t give a damn about the feelings of the vast majority of the population who don’t like to be exposed to homosexuality and for a good reason – it is a sexual perversion.

            Sexual attraction toward members of the opposite sex – men toward women and vice versa- is the only normal and valid form of sexuality. Sexual attraction toward any object OTHER THE PEOPLE OF THE OPPOSITE SEX (Animals, Same-Sex etc,) is a sexual deviacne and a disorder as it is in violation of the principles of human biology and physiology.

            The “Justice” system: What should be done to rapists and murderers and other criminals ?!

            In the name of “Human Rights” they show compassion and mercy onto those who should get none- psychopaths and criminals.
            Example must be shown and the criminals should not be shown mercy but should be imprisoned or executed. Example must be shown otherwise society will fall into barbarity,

            So what is Good and What is Evil. Good and evil is really judged by the RESULTS of your actions.

            Some actions that are portrayed as good are actually evil as they work in the service of evil, While other actions that on the outside are presented as evil are actually good as the work for the service of good and the greater good.

            It is good to repatriate the remove the aliens from Europe for the sake of our children’s future and true human rights and justice. Not doing it would lead to greater injustic i.e. genocide and no future for our kids.

            It is good to declare that men and women are not equal but complement each other on all level.

            It is good not to promote sick values in the media even if it means less “freedom” – freedom that will destroy people’s lives and really take away their true freedom.

            It is good to hurt the feelings of gays and bisexuals by telling them the painful truth that they suffer from a sickness and their sexual orientation is abnormal and not just “another option”. Telling them that they are “normal” would hurt them and society even more.

            When someone sees a doctor and he tells his patient that he has a cancer it is not because the doctor “hates” the patient. It is because of care.

            People who truly love gays would tell them the truth painful as it is. People who hate gays would lie and tell them that their lifestyle is “normal” and “healthy”.

            There must be a lot of hate to lie to people that their lifestyle is “normal” – that would make them die of disease or die without a family and children and support in old age.

            A doctor who tells a patient that has a cancer that he is completely “healthy and normal” is a doctor who truly hates his patient.

            Yet at the same time reminding them that they are not to be faulted for their condition anymore than people who are born diabetes are faulted for their condition. Yet should continue to remind gays that they are not hated or despised for their conditions as long as they don’t try to push it onto normal people. Even thought I’m sorry for gays and if I could I would very much make them normal i.e. turn them Straight so they can have a much easy life and happy life so they won’t have to live in shame.

            If I could I would. finding a cure for homosexuality is moral as it will help these poor souls live with dignity with no shame. Even though I believe it can be prevented in the womb by preventing dysfunctions and imbalances in the fetus’s sexual development. It’s really out care for gays that I want them to be normal. I don’t want them to be “freaks of nature”.

            Living in line with one’s sexual anatomy and body’s design is healing him.

            Curing a pathology is always moral. Being “politically correct” i.e. Tolerating it and pretending that it is “normal” is the most evil and immoral thing imaginable.

            I bet that every sane gay person would have liked to be normal/Straight and avoid life of pain. Helping these people is essential. You can only help them by pointing out that they suffer from a disorder not by pretending that the problem doesn’t exist.

            Yet at the same time promotion of this pathology should be fought without mercy and hesitation.

            What is Good and What is Evil?!

            Good is decided by the results, Are the results of your actions lead to better world to a happy world. If the are they are good. If They aren’t they are evil.

            Good is coming to terms with reality.

            Evil is ignoring reality.

            I want to dedicate the following song to our brothers and sisters not to fear and fight for the survival of our people and the health of our great Germanic nation. 🙂

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMBQ8tltx8

            Erik,

            Occupied Sweden

          • Mike on December 14, 2014

            there are many white races and the worst race in the world is the anglo-saxons. they are the executioners of their master the jew. they have destroyed Europe and the world!

          • abdul rasheed on October 15, 2015

            Yes of course .European stupid democracy is responsible for destruction of Europeans, I mean multiparty system.Jewish capital and Jewish controlled media is chief cause of europe,s crisis

    • Dylan on July 18, 2016

      This article doesn’t have any facts to back up its claims. Yes I’m sure many German troops were killed in the war but do were allied soldiers and Jews, this article is very antisemetic it is another priory of Zion conspiracy theory. The Germans created the theory of a secret plot by Jewish bankers to take over the world. The Rusdians also contributed to this thirty before they became communist. The holly Riman empire (Catholic Church) created this myth. It’s a malicious attack on Jewish people, the bankers behind the scenes creating the coas are probably mostly Christian, but why not reserrect a anti-Semitic conspiracy theory who Hirler believed in which gave him the justification to commit mass murder against the evil Jews! The creators of anti-Semitism is the Catholic Church after all the Jews murdered the savior(Jesus) why not create more dirt against them.

Leave a Reply

Share with your friends










Submit