Part 6 Battle of Britain

  • Aaron on March 17, 2016

    Churchill you sick, sick dog……..

    “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.” Winston Churchill –

    Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill – His Career in War and Peace, p. 145

  • peggy on January 13, 2016

    I appreciate your dedication and hard work on this documentary but in your map that shows the year and the British Empire I must point out that America was and is still under the rule of the British Empire, America is a British corporation. I believe it would be accurate to include America in red on the map as well and there is facts to back it up if researched the words (Britain still owns the U.S.)

    From quoted source: \”Esquire – In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others.\” Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
    Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David Hartley Esqr..
    Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
    In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free.
    When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown
    Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that \”a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.\”….\”in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire.\”
    All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. Researching history and documents you will see the British Empire is still collecting a tax from the American corporation.
    I too have been doing research and the web of lies is spun a lot bigger. It had lead me to the same conclusion you have here in a six hour documentary that would\’ve saved me a lot of time if I came across it earlier but it is not a popular view and is well hidden and not a widely known fact. The Zionist have had their hand in a lot of deception and it only grows.
    There are many sources on America not being the land of the free. We as people are a stock in the debt slave trade. Thank you for your time and hopefully you see this as an addition to your truth and in no way intended to demean but to help uncover the web of deceit.

  • MOHAMMED GHULAM on September 27, 2015


    • michael gavin on July 8, 2016

      i have a totally different perspective of Adolf Hitler…he is speaking from the grave for sure…and islam should be hailed in their fight to crush the jewry of the world…and im mexican by the way and love america the same way ah loved germany

  • ADOLF HITLER on September 26, 2015


    • P. Hubble on October 12, 2015

      Yeah, but I don’t hope that the British people will get destroyed. Today they have nothing to do with this crimes. I hope this slavery system in Britain will be perished. This system which is threatening even those people, who live in Britain now. This anti-german zionist influence-system. The germans and briitains are the same people. The same race. Germans and britains are in terms of ethnic race brothers and sisters. That was the reason why Hitler was so suffering, when he was forced to attack Britain by the Luftwaffe. But Churchill had cold blood. He was influenced by his high financiers and zionists to perish whole germany. The german economy the civilians and more. Winston, Franklin and Stalin. These guys were the evil warmongers. A shame. I’m a german historian. I know it. The mainstream post-war history is filled with lies and falsified facts. Terrible.

    • Thomas on January 20, 2016

      The day has come: Incipit Islam.

  • Fan on September 5, 2015

    “My feelings towards Hitler were, as such,
    as if he were some superhuman being,
    between a man and a god sent by providence!

  • Mousal on August 24, 2015

    People have known at least some of the truth for many years. I was told, twenty years ago, that WW2 was about Zionists and that they have run the media and governments in at US and UK and other countries. If you are interested there is a 1934 film about the Rothschild family and how they started funding wars, starting with Napoleon. It is on YT. It’s called something like ‘House of Rothschild’.
    There is so much information out there. Thanks to the internet. Just wish more people could be bothered to piece it together and do their own checking. For a lot of people it’s too much to get to grips with and they simply don’t care. That’s what’s supports the Zionists.
    There is a fair bit on YT about the exaggeration of the number of Jews killed and denial/suspicion that there was no gassing of people, this revolves around visits to Auschwitz. It is also recorded that some Jewish people have made up being in the camps or what happened to them, only a few but it is documented.
    I wondered why atrocities afflicted on Black people seemed to be brushed under the carpet and ignored. It made me feel sick. The 200 yr anniversary of the abolition of slavery in UK seemed understated to me. Then I realised compared to the perpetual reminders Jewish victimisation it was be under played, Jews pile tons of money on their plights and they have the media windows to maximise it.
    Zionists sent Lenin and Trotsky to the USSR and funded them. And they started the Federal Reserve (which isn’t federal and doesn’t have money reserves), they have been ousted from so many countries, through centuries, for usury and coin chipping, yet they always came back stronger. And for nearly a century they have run the show through sneaky and cruel methods. All of the wars and issues to do with US and Israel is all orchestrated by the Zionists.
    The Havaar agreement interesting.

  • earblock on August 6, 2015

    this documentary is amazing, i am an apolitical specimen, same retarded people to my eyes fascists, Communists and every 1 unable to see that government is immoral or unmoral, or booth…. but seek the truth is my duty, i am gonna strip down all your documentary finding reference to the mayor facts in different sources, hopefully with different political ideologies, so then i can trust the facts talked in the documentary as accurate, so then i can be sure that i am not believing lies any more.
    Until now i did it until chapter 5, and i was amazed when able to find many reference to the mayor points told in this documentary all over the internet.

    i really appreciate your work even when i see the story a bit 1 sided, and a bit propagandist because of how u place the music on it… (music rise many feelings by itself, and those feelings get mixed with the feelings that the provided information raises, and at the end is hard if not impossible for many people to realize if they are feeling sad because of the facts of because of the music :P…..

    still i find the historic value of this documentary so priceless 🙂

    grate job my brother.

    • VerumetLux on December 27, 2015

      Hello brother, would it be too much to ask if you could provide the best sources you find? I am also wishing to do the same, but I am a beginner at this. Good luck and thank you!

  • Artur Baker on July 22, 2015

    I think here is a big missunderstanding: I dont think there were murderous Polish people BEFORE the war broke but yes after that.

    I believe, as Hitler lived the time of last European days of honour, when war had been roaming all the time past 1000 years or so, Hitler really just wanted to make one big Germania and unite the ethnic Germans of the Europe. This means war, allways, and in those days it was still normal to resolve the issues with war.

    Hitler tried to solve things peacefully but it didn’t help, so the only way to get back the lost lands + have a landway to Prussia is to have a war.

    It was really that simple, I dont believe there was any pre-war murderous Polish people as many say.

  • steve holder on July 17, 2015

    It all sounds like a big he said, she said. War is insanity no matter what the petty justifications may imply. So Hitler wanted to get the jump on the filthy communist heathens who are baby eaters and to top it all off JEWS!!!I’ve learned to recognise the style of a Zionist greed after the wonderful press release of Larry Silverstein leaseor of wtc 1,2 and 7 on 9/11/2001. Who realized healthy profits from insurance settlements So no love lost between me and the jews, I can understand Adolfs motivation.The poor man was under tremendous stress. Before I Start a pro Hilter support group You still have to question the madness behind such a brutal form of extermination. Film says “yeah look what Stalin did!!! look what Britain didin India!!! look at what the united states did to the poor fucking natives! Yes all those attrocities are madness.That still cant make it ok for A.Hitler to attempt genocide in such a demoralizing and sadistic way .even if all jews were like Larry Silverstein! The insanity has to stop somewhere, and the airain German superiority should have been the party to break tradition and be more humane Adolf Hitler is still one of the most reviled people in history but at least he has more rival for first position.A.H ,,,,,notice the initials! hee hee,,,,, A.dolf H.itler asshole! All that aside he was a brilliant statesman,warrior,and motivation

    • konwayk on July 18, 2015

      steve, you should watch the “entire” documentary. Everyone knows about Holohoax to demonize Hitler and The Trail of Tears Hoax to demonize Andrew Jackson. These deceptions have been going on since first century Israel (Matthew 28:5-15).

      You should search “Six million Jews in newspapers” on Internet. You will find that Jews have been promoting “Six million Jews hoax” since 1800s to steal money from non Jews so that they can destroy non Jews for their own profits.

      Both legally and Biblically speaking, Hitler could have wiped off Jews from the face of the earth since Jews worldwide declared war on Germany on March 24, 1933 and were attacking Germans in Germany and in Polish regions.

      Jews murdered Germans like Wilhelm Gustloff and Vom Rath prior to WW2 and also created Kristallnacht. But he didn’t. Jews and their allied countries like Britain and France always play victims when they are the real perpetrators.

  • konwayk on July 17, 2015

    The destructive nature of Britain and France are always hidden from public. Britain and British people always cause disasters and create “atrocity hoax” and put the atrocity hoax on innocent people so that Britain can get away with their crimes. Britain and France never felt guilty about their crimes.

    Brits wanted “the entire German race” to be destroyed and promoted the destruction of all Germans in their media. But Brits promoting the destruction of entire German race is hidden by the media and they continue to promote Holohoax to destroy the entire German race. Here are some examples of Britain promoting the destruction of “the entire German race” during World War 2.

    1) During World War 2, Leicester vicar Rev C.W Whipp in Britain publicly encouraged Brits to wipe Germans out (Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser, October 16, 1940, Page 4). He also said “I hope RAF will smash Germany to smithereens. I would like to wipe Germany off the map. They are an evil race, and have been the curse of Europe for centuries.” (The Mail (Adelaide, SA), 7 September 1940, 1). 

    2) Headline “War to Death against all Germans!” (Vancouver Sun, April 23, 1940).
    “War to the death against the whole German people and not merely Nazi regime was urged today by Alfred Duff Cooper, former First Lord of Admiralty. Mr. Duff spoke before the Royal society of St. George in place of Winston Churchill, First Lord of Admirality…”

    Andrew Jackson saw Jewish Bankers and British as equal threat, because Jewish interests and British interests were and still are one and the same. The same thing can also be said about French interests.

    Throughout the history, Britain only caused nothing but disasters. American Revolutionary war, War of 1812, Demonization of Andrew Jackson, Opium Wars, India’s First War of Independence, American Civil War, Boer Wars, WW1, Bolshevik Revolution (Bolsheviks received secret support from Brits to take over Russia by murdering Rasputin), WW2, Palestinian genocide (the creation of Israel through Balfour Declaration under British) are great examples. After WW2, America is deceptively forced to do the dirty works for Britain through Israel.

    The evil, deceptive, and selfish mentality of Brits were revealed in National Socialist film “Ohm Kruger (1941).”

    Americans, other European countries, and the countries throughout the world need to realize that Britain and France were and still are their enemy.

    Prior to 1877, America and Britain were bitter enemies. British puppet Rutherford Hayes (1877 to 1881) transferred US economy into the hands of Rothschilds and British powers. It became far worse through Federal Reserve in 1913 and US became a complete puppet of their true enemy – Britain.

    Righteous Brits and Righteous French people are always treated as outsiders by Britain and France. That is why Britain and France persecuted righteous Brits and righteous french who fought for the truth.

    Along with Jews, Britain and France are also an equal threat.

  • marios on May 24, 2015

    the best real documentary on the internet, thanks gretings from Athens Hellas “Greece”

  • Belmin on January 26, 2015

    Can somebody tell me what is the name of the song’ or this music, in a part where it shows that war on poland lasted 29 days?

    • Cherry Hipps on July 5, 2016

      It’s called “fuck me in the dinglehole” by Your Momma

    • Mike Smiddy on June 6, 2015

      As someone who’s read a good deal about modern genetic tests of the Ashkenazi genome, the Khazarian theory is bull shit. Ashkenazis were the first Jewish group to out-breed like crazy, they most likely descended from the Radhanites (who traveled from northern Europe to as far as China).

  • Cartier McCloud on January 18, 2015

    This slaughter is coming to us soon if we don’t stop them. These are blueprints for our own demise.

  • frukhauf on November 5, 2014

    I adore your propaganda.

    • Internot on July 10, 2015

      Even if you look at it as propaganda remember that most of the other side of this is propaganda as well. The truth is somewhere in the middle. There were interests on both sides that wanted war. There was also interests that controlled the information to both sides that made their case for it.

      Because of the massive information campaign towards one idea (The NAZI’s are EVIL) the other side of the argument has been totally pushed off the page as fantasy. That should never be the case when looking at history. All sides should be looked at as open minded as possible to get to a true discernment of the facts.

  • frukhauf on November 5, 2014

    Unbelievable. Such distortion of truth. Yours. Stunning.

    • konwayk on November 6, 2014

      A Jew talking about Truth? That is like a complete blind man claiming that he can ride a car 100 miles per hour on a highway.

      Everyone knows that “a Jew” is synonym of “a liar.” So nobody is going to take your words seriously.

      • konwayk on November 24, 2014

        Correction – A complete blind man claiming that he can “drive” a car 100 miles per hour on a highway.

  • polish battles on November 4, 2014

    Names and sources

    The battle was fought in the territory of the monastic state of the Teutonic Order, on the plains between three villages:
    Grünfelde (Grunwald) to the west, Tannenberg (Stębark) to the northeast, and Ludwigsdorf (Łodwigowo, Ludwikowice) to the south.
    Władysław II Jagiełło referred to the site in Latin as in loco conflictus nostri, quem cum Cruciferis de Prusia habuimus,
    dicto Grunenvelt.[9] Later Polish chroniclers interpreted the word Grunenvelt as
    Grünwald, meaning “green forest” in German. The Lithuanians followed suit and translated the name as Žalgiris.[12] The Germans named the battle after Tannenberg (“fir hill” or “pine hill” in German).[13] Thus there are three commonly used names
    for the battle: German: Schlacht bei Tannenberg,
    Polish: Bitwa pod Grunwaldem, Lithuanian: Žalgirio mūšis.

    Its names in the languages of other involved peoples include Belarusian: Бітва пад Грунвальдам, Ukrainian: Грюнвальдська битва,
    Russian: Грюнвальдская битва,
    Czech: Bitva u Grunvaldu, Romanian: Bătălia de la Grünwald.

    The most important source about the Battle of Grunwald is Cronica conflictus Wladislai Regis Poloniae cum cruciferis anno Christi
    The most important source about the Battle of Grunwald is Cronica conflictus Wladislai Regis Poloniae cum cruciferis anno

    There are few contemporary, reliable sources about the battle, and most were produced by Poles.
    The most important and trustworthy source is Cronica conflictus
    Wladislai regis Poloniae cum Cruciferis anno Christi 1410, which was written within a year of
    the battle by an eyewitness.[14] Its authorship is uncertain, but several candidates have been proposed: Polish deputy
    chancellor Mikołaj Trąba and Władysław II Jagiełło’s secretary Zbigniew Oleśnicki.[15] While the original Cronica conflictus did not survive, a short summary from the 16th century has
    been preserved. Another important source is Historiae Polonicae by
    Polish historian Jan Długosz (1415–1480).[15] It is a comprehensive and detailed account written several
    decades after the battle. The reliability of this source suffers not only from the long gap between the
    events and the chronicle, but also Długosz’s biases against the Lithuanians.[16] Banderia Prutenorum is a mid-15th-century manuscript with images and Latin descriptions of the Teutonic battle flags captured during the
    battle and displayed in Wawel Cathedral. Other Polish sources include two letters written by Władysław II Jagiełło
    to his wife Anne of Cilli and Bishop of Poznań Wojciech Jastrzębiec and letters
    sent by Jastrzębiec to Poles in the Holy See.[16] German sources include a concise account in the chronicle of Johann
    von Posilge. A recently discovered anonymous letter, written between 1411 and 1413, provided important details
    on Lithuanian maneuvers.[17][18]
    Historical background
    Lithuanian Crusade and Polish–Lithuanian union

    Main article: Northern Crusades

    In 1230, the Teutonic Knights, a crusading military order, moved to
    Chełmno Land and launched the Prussian Crusade against the pagan Prussian clans.
    With support from the pope and Holy Roman Emperor, the Teutons conquered and converted the Prussians by the 1280s and shifted their attention to the
    pagan Grand Duchy of Lithuania. For about a hundred years, the
    Knights raided Lithuanian lands, particularly Samogitia, as it separated the Knights in Prussia
    from their branch in Livonia. While the border regions became an uninhabited
    wilderness, the Knights gained very little territory.

    The Lithuanians first gave up Samogitia during the Lithuanian Civil War (1381–1384) in the Treaty of Dubysa.
    The territory was used as a bargaining chip to ensure
    Teutonic support for one of the sides in the internal power struggle.

    Territory of the State of the Teutonic Order between 1260 and 1410;
    the locations and dates of major battles, including
    the Battle of Grunwald, are indicated by crossed red swords
    Territory of the State of the Teutonic Order between 1260 and 1410; the locations and dates of major battles,
    including the Battle of Grunwald, are indicated by crossed red swords

    In 1385, Grand Duke Jogaila of Lithuania agreed to marry Queen Jadwiga of Poland in the Union of Kreva.
    Jogaila converted to Christianity and was crowned as the King of Poland (Władysław II Jagiełło), thus creating a personal union between the
    Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

    The official Lithuanian conversion to Christianity removed
    the religious rationale for the order’s activities in the area.[19] Its grand master, Conrad
    Zöllner von Rothenstein, supported by the Hungarian king,
    Sigismund of Luxemburg, responded by publicly contesting the sincerity of Jogaila’s conversion,
    bringing the charge to a papal court.[19] The territorial
    disputes continued over Samogitia, which had been in Teutonic hands since the Peace of Raciąż of 1404.

    Poland also had territorial claims against the Knights in Dobrzyń Land and
    Danzig (Gdańsk), but the two states had been largely at peace since the Treaty of Kalisz (1343).[20] The conflict was
    also motivated by trade considerations: The knights controlled the lower reaches of the three largest rivers (the Neman, Vistula and Daugava)
    in Poland and Lithuania.[21]
    War, truce and preparations

    In May 1409, an uprising in Teutonic-held Samogitia started.
    Lithuania supported the uprising and the knights threatened to invade.

    Poland announced its support for the Lithuanian cause and threatened to invade Prussia
    in return. As Prussian troops evacuated Samogitia, Teutonic Grand Master Ulrich von Jungingen declared war on the Kingdom of Poland
    and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania on 6 August 1409.[22] The Knights hoped
    to defeat Poland and Lithuania separately, and began by invading
    Greater Poland and Kuyavia, catching the
    Poles by surprise.[23] The Knights burned the castle at Dobrin (Dobrzyń nad Wisłą), captured Bobrowniki after a fourteen-day siege, conquered Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) and sacked
    several towns.[24] The Poles organized counterattacks and recaptured Bydgoszcz.[25] The Samogitians
    attacked Memel (Klaipėda).[23] However, neither side was ready for a full-scale war.

    Lithuanians fighting with Teutonic Knights
    Lithuanians fighting with Teutonic Knights (bas-relief).

    Wenceslaus, King of the Romans, agreed to mediate the dispute.
    A truce was signed on 8 October 1409, and
    was set to expire on 24 June 1410.[26] Both sides used this time to
    prepare for war, gathering troops and engaging in diplomatic maneuvering.
    Both sides sent letters and envoys accusing each other of various wrongdoings
    and threats to Christendom. Wenceslaus, who received a gift of 60,000 florins from
    the knights, declared that Samogitia rightfully belonged to the knights and only Dobrzyń Land should be
    returned to Poland.[27] The knights also paid
    300,000 ducats to Sigismund of Hungary, who had ambitions regarding the Principality
    of Moldavia, for mutual military assistance.[27] Sigismund
    attempted to break the Polish–Lithuanian alliance by offering Vytautas a king’s crown; Vytautas’s acceptance would have
    violated the terms of the Ostrów Agreement and
    created Polish-Lithuanian discord.[28] At the same time, Vytautas managed to obtain a truce from the Livonian Order.[29]

    By December 1409, Władysław II Jagiełło and Vytautas had agreed on a common strategy: Their armies would unite into a single massive force and march together towards Marienburg
    (Malbork), capital of the Teutonic Knights.[30] The Knights,
    who took a defensive position, did not expect a joint attack, and were preparing for a dual invasion – by the Poles along the Vistula River towards Danzig
    (Gdańsk), and by the Lithuanians along the Neman River towards
    Ragnit (Neman).[3] To counter this perceived threat, Ulrich von Jungingen concentrated his forces in Schwetz (Świecie), a central location from where troops could respond to an invasion from any direction rather quickly.[31] Sizable garrisons were left in the eastern castles of Ragnit,
    Rhein (Ryn) near Lötzen (Giżycko), and Memel (Klaipėda).[3] To keep
    their plans secret and mislead the knights,
    Władysław II Jagiełło and Vytautas organised several raids into border territories, thus forcing the knights to keep their troops in place.[30]

  • Jonsson on July 31, 2014

    I’ve got a question if someone cares to explain. I do not deny nor agree the purpose of these videos, but if France and Britain wanted war, why didn’t they attack Germany in late 1939, when the Reich was busy dealing with Poland?

    • konwayk on August 1, 2014

      US, Great Britain and France didn’t attack Germany, because Jews in England wanted to make it look like Germany started World War 2.

      Great Britain and France (controlled by Jews) wanted to look like they were saving Poland and Europe.

      Jews always play the victims when they are the real perpetrators. This is the same method used by FDR against Japan.

      In later parts, you will see that FDR and Jews provoked Japan to attack Pearl Harbor. After Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, FDR and Jews blamed everything on Japan for Pearl Harbor. This is the same trick done again by FDR and Jews when they rejected Japanese surrender memo sent through MacArthur on January 20, 1945. Truman was aware of Japanese surrender memo didn’t do anything about it.

      They deceitfully made it “appear” like Japan wanted to continue the war. So they dropped atomic bombs in innocents in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

      The same thing was done by Winston Churchill. He and Jews destroyed Germany and put every blame on Germany when in fact they were the ones who denied peace offers sent by Germans.

      This is the same tactic done by Netanyahu against innocent Palestinians right now.

      He and his jews act like victims when in fact they are perpetrators.

      • Kaspa on August 14, 2014

        I think of 9/11 as i read your comment

      • Mousal on August 24, 2015

        And by the way Ford was selling tanks to the Russians and the Germans. And this double sided profiteering is normal in wars.

  • Berger on July 24, 2014

    More interesting posts:

    That question is thought to be important in evaluating who was the greater evil. However it must be known what “tactical bombing” and “strategic bombing” is.
    Tactic bombing is targeting definite military installations and requires smaller aircraft with good precision to aim. The German Air force was developed a tactical air force. Strategic bombing is aiming at large areas and requires larger airplanes, long range bombers to keep the bases out of the range of the enemy’s forces and planes flying higher to avoid contact with enemy fighters. Those plannings in the RAF were made in the 1930s. The RAF was a pure strategic Air Force and the USAF had only transferred their strategic part into Europe. Sometimes the bombing of Coventry is claimed to be a strategic attack, however very recently it became known that the attack was known to Churchill days before and was kept as a secret not to disclose that the British Secret Service was in possession of the German Enigma encryption device. Instead of a warning or alert RAF fighters to intercept the attack the German “Knickebein” electronic targeting system was interrupted which took off the capability for precisely targeting an object. In summary: “Who was first” is a question not to arrive at the core question, which is: “Who was first to use strategical bombing as a method of warfare?” . Here the answer is rather simple.

    Next post of interest:
    hitler was very careful and even was against fighting the brits. most people are unwilling to do the research,they make uneducated comments that are fed by the media. this is massive in scale. the truth about ww1 and ww2 are much different than the media portrays and the egos of many are to strong to fairly learn the truth.
    it is important to see the whole picture, who is behind the scenes? the money trail IS the key. do yourself a favor and learn why 100’s of millions died horribly,the worst is yet to come.

  • Berger on July 24, 2014

    I found this on the internet, is it correct????:

    Of course Japan bombed Chinese cities 1st and Germany bombed European cities 2nd (Poland 1939, Holland 1940), but if the question is meant to ask ‘who bombed whose civilians 1st’ between Germany and the UK, it’s more interesting.
    History records that the first bombing of mainland UK started August 12, 1940 under strict orders from Hitler (Aug 1) ‘not’ to target British cities. The Germans targeted British airfields (making some progress) and on Aug 23 started massive attacks on aircraft factories (the period Aug 24- Sept 6 is usually called the height or crucial time of the Battle of Britain when all hung in the balance).
    A little less officially (because it doesn’t always appear in the record) British Air Marshall Dowding memo-ed sometime about the last week August, that if the German progress kept up Britain might lose the air war in 3 weeks time.
    Back on the official record….the nights of August 23-24 the outskirts of London accidentally had bombs fall on it doing some damage and killing a few civilians, also the same nights bombing of airfields in Portsmouth had unintentionally killed almost 100 civilians. On August 25th Churchill ordered a large and showy bombing ‘retaliation’ of Berlin (a very difficult and daring thing at the very end of then British bomber range, as the Germans were using French airfields to bomb Britain), at least 81 bombers were used (a sizable force to risk at the time on such a risky mission). Bombs fell across Berlin indiscriminately (due to clouds). Little meaningful damage was done perhaps 50 civilians were killed (or less), but Hitler (and Goring) flew into predictable rages. Churchill then followed up the August 25th attack with more city wide attacks on Berlin August 26- Sept. 2 although again no military value was gained and little damage done. On Sept. 2 Hitler in a rage (his speech was recorded) called off his whole so far successful bombing/ destruction of British air power and ordered the terror bombing and killing of civilians in London and British cities. 4 days later (Sept. 6) British air power with the heat off and civilians taking the blows began to recover and of course would eventually win the battle.
    Historians have debated if the evidence makes out an actual case that the shrewd Churchill side tracked Hitler into bombing civilians in London as necessary to saving his air force through Sept 1940 to then win the battle

    • konwayk on July 24, 2014

      Whenever you look into internet on historical truth, you must look on whether the website is reliable or not in terms of telling the truth.

      There could have been accidental death of few British civilians. But that is entirely because of the fault of Churchill and Jews. Churchill and Jews wanted WW2. Not Adolf Hitler and Germany.

      Churchill was very upset that London was not being bombed.

      Historian David Irving points out that Churchill wanted the bombing to begin for three reasons.

      1) Tricking Americans into coming into the war in order to prove how frightful the Germans were.

      2) He wanted to take the weight off the fighter’s stations and radar’s stations who were being suffered under Herman Goering’s air force.

      3) Churchill wanted to kill the peace movement in his own country.

      Source –

      Time – 4:59-5:30.

      We all know that Churchill and Jews were behind the death of T.E Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) who wanted peace between Germany and Great Britain.

      In the same video, David Irving also points out that Neville Chamberlain was peaceable. Unlike Neville Chamberlain, Churchill was a warmonger.

      With Adolf Hitler, he loved the culture of Great Britain. He didn’t want any harm to come to them. But Germany had severe pressure due to the night bombing raids from Great Britain.

      But even after that, Adolf Hitler and Germany was still careful in attacking Great Britain. This is because FDR and American Jews were looking for every opportunity to drive US into war against Germany.

      As David Irving points out – “War is run by lunatics. all around. There is ordinary people. They are the ones who is doing the dying.”

  • konwayk on June 21, 2014

    Adolf Hitler and Germany gave British a chance by letting thousands of White non jewish British soldiers go free at Dunkirk with the hope that they will accept the peace offers.

    But British (controlled by Jews) didn’t bother to lift up a finger to support Germany and destroyed Germany with the support of British non Jews (especially Bomber Harris).

    Few British (starting with Lawrence of Arabia) who supported or fought with Germany were either killed or sent to prison for several years.

    If British non jews don’t lift up a finger against Jews in their nation, then they will get completely destroyed in the future. That is something British need to worry at this time period. The same also applies to Americans.

    The great American poet Ezra Pound warned about this in radio broadcast (March 15, 1942) to England.

    Ezra Pound – “Is there a RACE left in England? Has it ANY will left to survive? You can carry slaughter to Ireland. Will that save you? I doubt it. Nothing can save you, save a purge. Nothing can save you, save an affirmation that you are English.

    Whore Belisha is NOT. Isaccs is not. No Sassoon is an Englishman, racially. No Rothschild is English, no Strakosch is English, no Roosevelt is English, no Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Baruch, Schiff, Sieff, or Solomon was ever yet born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you have murdered your empire, and it is this filth that elects your politicians. You have lost your tradition.

    You have not even learned what Lord Byron told you. You are, as even that foul rag the Times tells you, a little late in making a start.” (March 15, 1942).

    • nick on June 24, 2014

      Why do you think Hitler let the British army escape?

      Was it justified? If he hadn’t he could have forced the Brits to do peace in exchange for the British army captured.

      • TGSNTtv on June 24, 2014

        That’s a good point, he could have captured them and held them ransom or as bargaining chip for a peace treaty. Many think it was a military blunder and he should have annihilated them instead of giving them time to escape.
        My opinion is, I think Hitler still wanted to make peace with England and this was a gesture that went unnoticed. Churchill was hell bent on War and destroying Germany, and we have learnt that he made dozens of peace offerings that went unheard.

        • konwayk on June 24, 2014

          I think Adolf Hitler wanted all British soldiers to realize that his intentions to make peace between Germany and England were 100% honest.

          Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, and Germany was well aware of the lies published by Jews in British and American newspapers.

          If Hitler and Germany captured British soldiers and held them ransom or as bargaining chip for a peace treaty, then this would have caused jews to write more lies in newspapers and this would have helped FDR in driving US into the war against Germany much more earlier.

          Adolf Hitler points out it was FDR who was sabotaging all possibilities of peace in Europe starting from 1938.

          From March 1939, Adolf Hitler knew that FDR was trying to bring another World War and Churchill was cooperating with him. So Adolf Hitler was trying everything to avoid another World War.

          So Adolf Hitler let the British soldiers at Dunkirk escape in order to make them realize that he truly wanted to make peace between Germany and Great Britain. Unfortunately, Great Britain completely disregarded Adolf Hitler’s peace offers and his true attempts to make peace.

        • nick on June 25, 2014

          Did Churchill fight for the interests of the English people?! Germany did not consider England an enemy. In fact in terms of historical roots the Germanic tribes of Scandinavia gave birth to the people of Germany, while the people of Germany – through the Germanic Anglo-Saxons – gave birth to the English nation.

          Scandinavians,Dutch, Germans and English people are Germanic peoples in terms of their origin and DNA. why would Churchill hate Germany so much to refuse peace offer of Hitler. The English and the Germans are Germanic cousins. Why would England refuse to do peace with its own family? Why didn’t they remove Churchill from power?

          Was Churchill controlled by Jews??

          • konwayk on June 25, 2014

            Several people outwardly appeared as English. But they were not English as Ezra Pound mentions it (one of my above previous posts). They were disguised themselves as English in order to hide their jewish identity.

            With Churchill, the first that must be noted about Churchill is he was an Anti-German.

            “Germany is too strong. We must destroy her.” – Winston Churchill, Nov. 1936.

            Jerusalem Post also claims that Churchill was Jewish on his mother’s side.

            “Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill , née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.” Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post, January 18 1993.

            Winston’s mother, Jenny Jacobson ‘was a notorious adulteress’. Jenny Churchill’s promiscuity was commented upon by historian William Manchester in Volume 1 of his incomplete Churchill trilogy, The Last Lion.

            Great Historian Mark Weber points out the relationship between Winston Churchill and Jews –

            All of the major political authorities in 1930s and 1940s England were Jews. This is confirmed by Jews themselves.

            On the 3rd of June, 1938, the American Hebrew boasted that they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France, and that these “three sons of Israel will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell.” – Joseph Trimble, the American Hebrew.

          • Erik on June 26, 2014

            Yes. Churchill was controlled by Jews i.e. He was an agent of International Jewry.

            Because of him Europe as a whole is in trouble and the Aryan race is in crisis.

  • konwayk on December 18, 2013

    I can see your points, Dennis.

    But it must also be noted that Churchill was also an Anti-German. He intensely hated Germans. For Example, there was a movie called “The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943).” It was directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger (a Hungarian Jew). The film portrayed Nazis and Nazi Germany as evil.

    But what outraged Winston Churchill was that a German (played by Anton Walbrook) was portrayed sympathetically. Winston Churchill tried to prevent the film from being made. So when the film was made, Churchill hated it and wanted to ban the film.

    So aside from the influence of Churchill’s bosses, I do think that Churchill’s intense hatred against Germans was also a key factor in continuing Britain’s war with Germany.

    • Aragorn on May 21, 2014

      Churchill was a traitor to England.

      Because of him Britain lost its Empire, Britain’s flooded by non whites and if nothing is done the 21st century will see the total racial extinction of the British people – all thanks to Churchill who was a slave for the Jews.

      He should have excepted Hitler’s peace offers but he had refused.

      Because of Churchill not only Britain is racially in a crisis but all the white race worldwide.

      Churchill also got the US into WW2 against Germany. This prevented Germany from winning the war against the USSR.

      Churchill wanted England to turn into African, Arab/Semitic country rather than to remain Germanic country.

      Churchill not only hated Germany but he also hated England itself and everything Germanic as a result of his hatred to Germany.

      I guess Churchill hated the English people since the English people itself had its historical roots in the Germanic tribes of Germany.

      Churchill is a true example of a TRAITOR.

      • Raymond Daubney on May 28, 2014

        Churchill’s mother was an American born Jewess. She came from a wealthy family which was married into another Jew family, the Roosevelts. Thus making him cousin to Franklin D. Roosevelt. During WW1 when Churchill was First Sea Lord of the Navy his cousin Frank was Secretary of the Navy in the U.S. The two used their corresponding positions to set up the sinking of the Lusitania full of contraband munition’s & American civillians in order to bring the U.S. into the war. The two Jewish war criminals were thus getting practise for another war. The English Jew historian Bullock state’s that the bombing of Britan was to satisfy Goring but the fact is that Churchill was bombing German cities to goad Hitler into retaliate against British cities to gain sympathy from the U.S.and make the Brits hate the Germans even more . One should also keep in mind that the German’s did not develop 4 enginde bomber’s nevessary for mass bombing of cities where as the Brits had. The German air force was not designed for that kind of war . It was designed to be used in the field against land armies as part of the Blitzkreig tactic which also combined artillery, tank’s & infantry in concert. None of this was intended as a way to wipe out as many cities & their unarmed occupants as possible. This yet another jew American/british case of hypocrisy. At the time of a visit of Russia’s Mollatov to Berlin, before Germany’s retaliation against the British, the Brit’s launched an attack on that city to embarrase the German’s in the eyes of their Russian visitor. This is a good documentary for the unknowledgible who make up the much greater of our populations.

    • P. Hubble on November 12, 2015

      World war two was a war of worldview\’s. It was a war between national-socialism and high capitalism. It was a war between communism and national-socialism. A war between national-socialists and zionists. A war between the privately-owned banks and the nationalized banks. A war between the babylon-world and the free world of Germany under Hitler. In Hitler\’s speech of declaring war on USA, he repeated, that after the war Churchill and Roosevelt (the jewish puppets) wanted to build up an new world order. Hitler rejected that project. He fought against that before. Because he has his own view, that it wasn\’t god\’s own creation. Hitler was a Christian and wanted to defend god\’s creation. Freedom for every races and people. It was a war between nationalists, that want to defend the god\’s created word order, and the zionists, who wanted to make a new world order. Guy\’s. I have to tell you something. We are still in WW2. Fight. Fight. Fight. Then we\’re making Hitler to the Chancellor of the world.

  • konwayk on December 17, 2013

    We know about the role of Jewish NKVD in the deaths of innocent Germans in Danzig Massacre.

    But Jews even publicly declared that they were going to bring a war on Germany and the destruction of Germany. Jews were deliberately trying to create a war against Germany from the time period between 1933 and 1940.

    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934, quoted in ‘I Testify Against The Jews’ by Robert Edward Edmondson, page 188, and ‘The Jewish War of Survival’ by Arnold Leese, page 52

    “Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later.” Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934, also quoted in his book ‘The New Holy Alliance’

    Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her. One may be sure of this: We will lead that war! – Bernard Lecache, the president of the ‘International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism,’ in its newspaper ‘Droit de Vivre’ (Right to Life), 9 November, 1938.

    “The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.” – The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israelieten in Nederland, September 13, 1939

    Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German ‑ wipe them out! Llya Ehrenburg, Glaser, p. 111.

    The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years. Rabbi M. Perlzweig, head of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress, Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940.

    Germany was always the target of Jews from 1933. Here is another interesting information.

    The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration. Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, October 20, 1933 [… and later dragged the US into WWII].

  • konwayk on December 13, 2013

    What is so sad about this portion of the video is how much Adolf Hitler loved people in England. He wanted peace with England. What did that treacherous Churchill do? He not only betrays Adolf Hitler and Germany, but also his own nation by sending them to war for his own profits and Jewish profits.

    • Dennis Wise on December 18, 2013

      Yes, but Churchill was only the front man for the Establishment. Remember Churchill was not voted in democratically, he was placed in charge. Which means he had a boss or bosses. You also have to remember the person or people who did put him in charge are always in charge. Votes will never move them only a successful invasion as in 1066.

  • Bernard on December 3, 2013

    You have to find the truth, know the trust and the truth will set you free…Zeitgeist. What a profound statement!

  • vigithunor on November 5, 2013

    You also failed to mention, Eisenhower, Churchill, and Stalin, all 3 were Jews.

    • Dennis Wise on December 18, 2013

      Yes and there was a reason for it. You have to understand this was originally a documentary posted on YouTube and having suffered YT channels being taken down before, I decided to leave the Jewish subject (at least after part 4 and The Transfer Agreement) as late as possible. This I believe enabled me to get 24 parts out of 25 uploaded and circulated around the internet before my channels were eventually shut down. I also never mention they were all Freemasons but that is for another documentary. There was already too much for some people to absorb.

    • Raymond Daubney on May 28, 2014

      You are absolutely right, all three, how convenient. But that of course was just another one of those coincidences. Where ever Jew’s are involved it’s a coincidence but never a conspiracy. That’s what they say about 9/11.

    • Christopher on July 17, 2014

      Was Stalin really a Jew? I thought most of the people he purged were the Jews who helped Lenin into power.

      • konwayk on July 18, 2014

        Yes, Stalin was Jewish and a Bolshevik. Bolshevism is one of the inventions of Judaism.

        “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism” – Jewish Chronicle London, April 4, 1919.

        A columnist in the Los Angeles B’nai B’rith Messenger, March 3, 1950, col. 2, p. 5 wrote: “A former Soviet general claims that Joseph Stalin is of Jewish ancestry.”

        Many White Russians who fled the Bolsheviks say Stalin was a Jew. One, a captain in the Czar’s armies, stated that he knew Stalin in their boyhood and that Stalin’s father (Djugashvili) was “a Jewish cobbler.”

        Stalin’s strong support for Judaism can be seen in the below information.

        JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316) “Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.”

      • fromRussia on October 20, 2014

        stalin was a machine to kill people! He killed people of his own country- soviet people- millions of russians belorussians ukranians etc etc!!!!!! our old old generation remembers that time- absolutely insane.there is interesting point that stalin was put in charge by zionists but! then he understood their real plan and as he started to be very strong he cut all connections wiz zionists. thats why the ammount of killed ppl during his reign is lil less than was planned b4. but its absolute untrue that most ppl he killed were jewish. more than 10 million ppl were sent to death by stalin.

        • konwayk on October 21, 2014

          That’s non sense. Why on earth would Stalin kill Jews? The entire Bolshevik movement was Jewish. The people behind Stalin were Lazar Kaganovich (Jew) and Ilya Ehrenburg (Jew) which is also pointed out by Joseph Goebbels in January 21, 1945 – (Weekly newspaper, Das Reich, Berlin).

          Not one protest against Jews was permitted in Stalin’s Russia. If they did, then they would have been executed. All of those people he killed were non Jews.

          Stalin never considered Russians as his people. He only considered Jews as his people. Judaism and Zionism are one and the same.

          Here is the link to the actual truth about Judaism –

      • Jared on January 11, 2015

        I thought he was Jewish on his mother’s side.

  • vigithunor on November 5, 2013

    “In reality, they (allies) are worried about Germany’s rapid economic growth, and will not suffer further German advancement. At stake are the British and French empires,”

    No sir.
    You are wrong.
    At stake is Jewish international banking and the neo-wage-slavery debt system which is worse than medieval serfdom under which, serfs paid only 33% tax, along with the Jewish Frankfurt school whose mission statement was “We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.” and its nation-destroying principles of feminism, homophilia, multi-culturalism, democratism (read bought and paid for meat-puppets) degeneracy and globalism, of the Jew’s materialistic metaphysics in which man is viewed solely as “an economic animal rather than a spiritual being with a soul” that turns everyone into either a consumer or a commodity and everything that has traditionally made life worth living – family, community, religion – into an economic calculation, versus usury/interest free banking, prosperity, abundance, nationalism, racial identity, pride, tradition, family, White children, and yeoman White working middle class freedom and safety – in a word, life.
    A thousand words silently illustrated, Mammon by George Frederick Watts was what Germany was fighting.
    It had nothing to do with “British” or “French” empires, and everything to do with International Jewish Banksters.

    Today, beastiality brothels are a legal reality in Germany,
    and in America
    while special annual leave is given ONLY to same sex marriage in the US military.
    “No Rothschild is English, No Barouk, Morgenthau, Koen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Schiff, Sheaf, or Solomon was ever born Anglo Saxon. And it is for this filth, that everybody fights these wars. It is for this filth, that you murder your (British) empire. It is this filth, that elects, selects, your politicians.” (Spelling errors mine)
    Ezra Pound March 15 1942 radio broadcast

    If you wish a Truth to out, then it must be the Truth.

    • Dennis Wise on December 18, 2013

      Sorry, I don’t believe I was wrong. It was too much for some Elites in both France and Britain to see Hitler slowly and surely dismantle the Versailles Treaty. Many people have pointed out they had forgotten or had not realised the size of the British Empire, especially with the anti-German propaganda spouted for 70 years, “Hitler wanted to rule the world.” The British and French were already ruling most of it. Having said that, it wasn’t the only reason as you have pointed out and I do mention these other points you raised later in the series.

      • Stefano on November 7, 2015

        Dennis, according to Irving, Hitler and Germany didn’t want to dismantle the French and the English empire, he knew German couldn’t have controlled it; both English and French had had a long lasting control over those countries and a navy that could mantain it. Hitler wanted control over east europe, he needed ukrainian wheat to feed the German population. Also we Italians needed more land to feed our people. After the embargo and other economic sanctions after the Abissinan war Italy got worse and The Fascist party began to lose support from the people.. It sufficed some American and Bristish bombs on civilians and the lost of the Empire and the landing of the Allied onto Italian soil to turn the popolation against his previous God. It’s sad, but Germany was militarly defeated also because of Mussolini’s hasty campaigns in Africa and Greece. Am I right Dennis?

    • netuno on December 24, 2013

      what’s the problem with multiculturalism?

      • Erik Vikingaxe on March 8, 2014

        Are you serious? Have you lived in a multikulti area? Multikulti is hell on earth my friend!

        • brian on April 20, 2014

          boy, i’m sure glad we don’t have that out here in california

      • Dennis Wise on August 21, 2014

        Your question should really be… What is the problem with FORCED multiculturalism? That is what is happening in Europe today. It is the systematic breeding out of the white race.

        • frukhauf on November 5, 2014

          who knew it was a policy. btw, nice editing of the comment feed.

        • prince of persian on January 28, 2015

          Dear Dennis Music on Fuhrer Speech is too high please Edit that part i think Fuhrer voice is most beautiful music <3

          • marios on May 24, 2015

            i agree with you 100%

Leave a Reply